David Mokaya, a university student, is seeking KSh 200 million from Safaricom. His demand comes just days after a court cleared him of charges linked to a controversial social media post.
The post, shared on X, allegedly suggested the death of William Ruto — a claim that quickly drew public attention and triggered investigations.
Authorities moved in swiftly after the post surfaced. Mokaya was arrested and charged under cybercrime laws.
However, after hearing the case, the court found him not guilty, setting him free and bringing the criminal proceedings to an end.
Now, the focus has shifted from the courtroom to a compensation claim. Mokaya, through his lawyer Danstan Omari, argues that his rights were violated during the investigation.
According to the lawyer, Mokaya’s electronic devices were seized and examined without a proper court warrant.
He claims this action was illegal and infringed on his client’s privacy and constitutional protections.
The legal team has issued a 48-hour demand notice to Safaricom, seeking KSh 200 million in damages.
The claim suggests that the telecom company played a role in the process that led to the alleged unlawful access to Mokaya’s data.
While full details of the claim have not yet been made public, the demand signals a possible legal battle ahead if the matter is not settled.
This case raises serious questions about digital rights in Kenya. How far can investigators go when handling suspected cybercrime? What procedures must be followed before accessing someone’s personal devices or data? And what responsibility do telecommunications companies have when assisting authorities?
As the 48-hour ultimatum ticks away, many are watching closely. The outcome could shape future cases involving social media posts, online speech, and privacy rights in the digital age.
Whether the dispute ends in court or through negotiation, it is clear that this case has sparked a wider conversation about freedom, responsibility, and the limits of state power online.
Post a Comment